Mirrors

Mirrors

Mirrors

It has been a while since I’ve added any book or movie reviews. Hopefully I can get a few added this weekend.

For now I’ll post my two-cents on the movie Mirrors. In my honest opinion I liked the movie. In this day and age it’s really hard to find a movie where the plot is something new let alone original.

Don’t get me wrong, Mirrors wasn’t any type of break through in movie ideas; however, it’s watchable.

I think the reason I liked it was that it took a while for the plot line to unravel. It was good at creating mystery and kept you guessing through ¾ of the movie to what the hell was going on.

So, the movie goes like this:

Jack Bauer gets a job at a security guard at an old building that was nearly destroyed in a fire. The only building contents that weren’t destroyed in the fire were these big ass mirrors.

Soon Jack starts hearing and seeing things and come to realize that the mirrors are bad. However, the badness isn’t just the mirrors it’s any thing that provides a reflection.

Jack soon realizes he’s on borrowed time and needs to do something fast other wise his whole family might be in jeopardy. Anyway, not to give it away but once they start talking about Sister Mary you will figure out what’s going on.

If you buy the DVD version be sure to watch the alternate ending. It’s cool.

Tagged with:
 

Movie Critics don’t know shit.

 

Yeah, I said it… movie critics don’t know a damn thing about movies. I decided to write this after reading two movies reviews last night. The first review was over the new Transformers movie which was trashed. The second review was over the film The Chronicles of Riddick which was also trashed.

 

Before I get into my trash talking I need to explain a little bit about my background. When I was around 12 years old I got into horror movies big time! It wasn’t the ‘thrill’ of being scared I was interested it. It was the how they did the special effects in the movie. Coming from a poor family my ‘movie’ watching was very limited.

 

VHS just took off and movie rental places soon followed. For my birthday my mom and a close family friend took upon a task to record 100s of movies for me. They had a friend at the rental place who loaned them movies and in turn they recorded them.

 

It was awesome needless to say. However, I had 100s of tapes with 3 movies on each tape. The bad thing was there had no movies details; you had to watch the movie to find out what it was about.  Every genre was represented, martial arts, horror, sci-fi, romance, comedy and some I have no clue how to classify them.

 

I watched them all; the good and the bad. Good or bad, it was great. I didn’t get to watch many movies after those since going to the flicks were expensive and renting was too.

 

Fast forward to my first year in college in Oklahoma City. I was staying with some relative who did nothing but fight all the damn time. It was a terrible situation to be in so everyday after work and college I’d go to the Dollar Saver Cinema not far from where I was staying.

 

Movies for buck! It was awesome! I watched EVERYTHING!

 

Fast forward to the present where I have a good job making decent green. I have a huge DVD collection and hit the movies at least once a week.

 

Now, I’m not implying that I’m more qualified to be a ‘critic’ than these other bozos. I will say that I’m more open minded though. If you only look for bad that’s all you will find.

 

The purpose of a movie is to try and entertain the most people while making a decent profit. There is no other way around it. Movie companies would go broke if they consistently backed movies that only entertained a few folks and made little or no profit. Sorry, that just the way of the world.

 

Now, for the brainless critics. I’ve noticed a trend in how movies are critiqued by the so called movie critics. It seems, if the movie has positive buzz from advanced screening critics like Ebert or Roper, then everyone else jumps on the band wagon. Other wise, the critics rail the movie.

 

So, the reviews about Transformers made me laugh. Here’s a link: http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1809943432/critic

 

For instance Roger Ebert (who I thought was dead) railed the movie really bad. Complaining about the robots and the plot line yadda yadda yadda. Then the Boston Globe had the nerve to write “2 ½ hours of tumescence disguised as a motion picture”.

What the fuck does that mean? It gets better; Matt Pais from the Chicago Tribune says “A 150-minute simulation of life in a garbage disposal”. Yeah Matt, you would know.

 

As you read through these critics reviews you’ll realize how fucking ignorant these guys are. They use big words and a lot of really stupid sentences to rag on movies.

 

They seem to forget one thing… these movies are to entertain. Yes, Mr. Ebert we know that it might be hard to believe that a robot could come from outer space and be a semi. However, it’s also hard to believe that a city would let a caped crusader run around town yet you gave that movie an A.

 

I found out along time ago if I listened to critics I’d never see a decent movie in my life. I don’t know about most folks but I go to the movies to escape reality. Bring on the alien robots, the super hero in spandex, and the futuristic cyborg killers. If I want to see comedy and romance I’ll watch any of the local TV shows. There is a shit load of that programming on TV every night for free.

 

Critics have one major issue they cannot put them selves into a normal movie goers place. They have been tainted by all the other critics to the point it’s just a mindless game.

 

“Oh fuck! Rolling Stone said that movie was bad!!!…. Shit! Shit! Shit! I liked it … but if I post a review that I liked it… then I’ll be a laughing stock of the critics wash room. Then I might never get a chance to have my own movie review show! I know.. I’ll write something witty about how bad it was.  God I can’t wait for it to come out on DVD!”

 

If critics only reviewed movies for OTHER critics then everything would be ok. That’s not the case sadly.

 

I will not let any critic’s judgment deter me from going to a flick.

 

If a critic posted a review like:

 

“Personally, I didn’t like the movie. The plot line was really confusing and hard to follow. The actors did a good job of acting but were placed in scenes that really didn’t add up or make sense. There was a lot of foul language and naked people. If you like that kind of stuff this movie is for you. However, parents with little kids be warned.”

 

However, that would be just to simple to do.

 

 

 

 

Tagged with:
 

MTV 2009 Movie Awards

I haven’t posted anything ‘news’ worthy in a while. Some of you might think this isn’t ‘news’ worthy either. However, my blog so I write what I want. ;-)

 

Last night I turned the channel to the MTV 2009 Movie Awards. I must say, thank god there was only an hour left. I used to love the MTV Movie Awards. They would spoof upcoming films and most the time it was pretty humorous. Now, it’s just bland.

 

However, the reason I’m posting is because I’m puzzled by the movie ‘Twilight’.  It swept the movie awards. It won best kiss, best breakthrough male performance, best female performance, best movie, and best fight.

 

Is this the same movie I seen on DVD? I thought maybe I watched the wrong flick or something. The movie “Twilight” blowed. It was slow, predictable, and overall boring. It’s another rehash of a vampire story telling but with a twist – young people fall in love.

 

I know that sometimes book-to-movie doesn’t do the book itself justice. I figured that was the same with this one. However, for it to sweep the awards just goes to show that if you have a book with a young female following you can just make it into a shitty movie and they will still love it.

 

Let’s even break this down further…

 

It won best movie over Ironman, Batman, & Slum dog Millionaire? Really?

“Twilight” isn’t even in the same league as these movies yet it got best pic. That is truly messed up.

 

Best kiss – who the fuck cares.

 

Best fight – I’m totally lost on this one. In the movie Cam Gigandet fights Pattinson for about 15 seconds. It’s terrible and again predictable. You want to see a fight watch Cam in Never Back Down. It doesn’t have any vampires, you can still hate him, however, there is “fighting”. Pattinson’s best fight was in Harry Potter. He did die in that film, but it was still better.

However, to say the ‘best fight’ was in Twilight and not Batman or Ironman shows a lot of stupidity.

 

Best break through performance of a female and male – This is plain bullshit. Stewart and Pattinson had better acting and roles in other movies. Stewart in The Messengers and Pattinson in the Potter flick. If anyone should have won this – it should have been a few of those kids from Slum dog. However, there wasn’t a catchy book with a huge teen following preceding that movie.

Tagged with:
 

The Happening

The HappeningOk, I went and saw the  M. Night. S.  movie the other night: The Happening. I was on a forum where people were bashing him because this movie didn’t live up to his other movies (a.k.a. the kick ass ending). 

He’s made some good movies in the past and to be judge by those movies is kind of unfair.
Each movie is different in its own way and a director (and writer) can’t guarantee that his movies will be a hit. Just ask Tarintino about his last movie endeavor. It blew.

Anyway, I’m a big movie buff and seen all of his other movies except Lady in the Water (but I will). I didn’t rush to the movies to see this flick. I was told it was scary by some friends so I decided to see for myself.

For the first few minutes it was pretty intriguing. Then, like the SAW flicks, it got old. Don’t get me wrong, creatively coming up with way to off one’s self I guess is a daunting task. Yet…it get’s old.

So, I wasn’t a big fan of this movie. It could have been a lot better. It was more like a sci-fi original movie fodder. It was painfully slow, way to much ‘emotional’ crap between the actors, and stupid decisions like “Here watch my kid because I care more for my wife than my kid. I know my wife is old enough to take care of herself and my child isn’t yet I’m going to abandon her to your care anyway. Also, since I’m a mathematician I know that I have a %68 chance of finding her the next town if I don’t die a horrible death first.”

Well, it wasn’t quite like that but dang near close enough.

Now, if the rude old lady (Betty Buckley) was causing it… that would have been cool. There were way too many subplots and just plain weird people.

 

I am going to make a generalization here, women in general find anything scary. The women who I talked to said this movie was totally scary and they had to cover their eyes the whole time. You watch it and be the judge; I thought it was kind of soft myself.

Tagged with:
 

The Incredible Hulk (2008)

The Incredible Hulk (2008)In the past two weeks I’ve seen this movie twice. Not because it’s a good movie (which it was) but because I just had the opportunity to go twice. I really like the movie. It and Ironman, so far have proved to be very good Marvel movies. The story is not related to the Hulk movie that was produced by Ang Lee. This movie story line is a variation of the T.V. version The Incredible Hulk. It even had cameos by Lou Ferrigno and Bill Bixby even though I didn’t see the cameo spot by Bill Bixby. Over all, Bruce Banner is hunted by General Ross so he can exploit the power of the Hulk. Along the way, a new threat is introduced: The Abomination. Which leads to a fantastic fight in N.Y.

 

I have to give the director credit, he was able to show so much feeling and emotion through the facial expression of Bruce Banner and the Hulk that you didn’t need sit through a dance number like in Spider Man 3 or listen to constant whining. It was well directed movie and worth the money for a ticket.

 

On a side note: if my memory serves me correctly; Betty Ross (Banner’s love and the General Ross’s daughter) was a strong willed woman in the comics. In the movie they made her sappy cry bag. However, I guess it had its place since it would piss the Hulk off enough to help her out.

Tagged with: